• Photo Gallery
  • The Store
  • About
Doug Luberts (.com)

Hopelessly eclectic, Thoroughly geeky …

  • Digital Content Creation
    • Editing
    • Photography
    • VFX
    • Video
    • Web Video
  • Entertainment
    • TV, Film, Radio
      • Feature Films
      • Radio
      • Television
    • Web Television
  • Featured
  • News and Announcements
    • Geektastic Nebula
    • TurboMandala Entertainment
  • Writing
    • Authors and Writers
    • Book Reviews
    • Entertainment Technology
    • Geekery
      • Moto Geekery
      • Techno Geekery
    • Inspirational Quotes
    • Media & Entertainment
    • Music
    • New Media
      • Social Media
    • Photo and Video Gear
    • Photography and Photographic Resources
    • Politics
    • Short Stories and Fiction

Browsing February, 2012

St. Patrick's Church, San Francisco, 2012. Nikon D7000.

Nikon D7000: Closer Look, and a Peek at the D800

Posted on February 12, 2012 by Doug Luberts

Time’s flown pretty fast since last March, when I wrote this post about first impressions of my new Nikon D7000. Seems like I really owe my readers an update on the camera, and my experiences with it since then.

I love the D7000. It creates amazing images, and finally gives me the level of camera that I need to create images that are as compelling, and reach the same kind of quality, that could be achieved with Nikon film bodies during the analog shooting days.

Not going to get into a big tech analysis on the camera features…Think I covered that in the previous post, linked above, and there’s also a lot of online coverage and fact sheets available.

The D7000 is a strong shooter, build-to-last, and with a control set that will be comfortable to all Nikon shooters as soon as they pick the camera up.

For stills, in conjunction with Adobe Lightroom, it’s a superstar.

 

St. Patrick's Church, San Francisco, 2012. Nikon D7000. Processed in Adobe Lightroom.

 

For Digital Cinema applications, the D7000 is a major leap forward for Nikon. The D90 was flawed, to the point of almost being useless for video, by a slow sensor and resulting digital artifacts.

Nikon still has a way to go, and I think they actually got there with the newly-announced D800, which is a superb cinema camera with updated features and ergonomics not found in the D7000.

I’m including the Nikon “Joy Ride” video, shot with the D800, to give you an idea of what this new camera is capable of, and you can keep up to date on the D800, and all other Nikon news at NikonRumors.com, which is my go-to news source for all things Nikon.

While I’m still shooting all of my web video with the D7000, and the video is gorgeous, the biggest issues with the camera revolve around the need to set exposure outside of live view mode, and then go back into live view to capture your video…It’s a pain in the butt. Nothing more than an annoyance that doesn’t affect the quality of the work, but the shooting experience suffers for it.

Changes made to camera settings while in live view aren’t reflected in exposure, and live view does not give you exposure information in the LCD.

Also, Nikon just doesn’t seem to care enough about the workflow…Where Canon offers plugins for FCP, and other software, to make the ingest experience seamless, Nikon is an all manual process involving copying files and transcoding, and possibly having issues with Gamma viewing problems in FCP that are just more work than they are worth…I’m going to be buying a Canon, likely a D60, this year for shooting video, as Nikon just doesn’t seem to want to get the workflow right for HDSLR shooters.

The lack of a headphone jack on the camera was a huge mistake…One that I resolved by using a Juiced Link DSLR Pre-amp Adapter for $144, which you should just figure in as part of the cost of the camera if you’re going to be shooting video…It’s worth it, and an absolute necessity if you are doing single-system sound.

The audio quality out of the D7000 is not bad, and good enough for single-subject interviews, but you’ll likely want to go dual system for anything more elaborate than an interview setup. In that case the Zoom H4n is still the best, and most versatile option for web shooters.

This Juiced Link DSLR mic pre-amp includes the headphone jack that Nikon left off the camera, and is a must for video shooters.

 

Another great thing about the D7000 is that it works with all of the Nikon AF-S/AF-D line of lenses, which you can pick up on eBay for a song. The older lenses are a bit slower focusing than their newer counterparts, and don’t have the VR (vibration-reduction) features, but they do have an aperture ring, great glass, and create awesome images. One big advantage that you don’t find with the red-ring lenses so highly coveted by Canon shooters.

On the whole, the D7000 is an amazing camera, and the best ‘pro-sumer’ (emphasis on the pro) camera Nikon makes before you get into the D800 realm … Something I hope to do within the next year. :)

 

Ciji and Adrian, February 2012. Nikon D300. The older D300 produces great results, but its auto-focus system and sensor are no match for the D7000.

timthumb

Twitter 2012: Finding Your Voice in Changing Conversation

Posted on February 11, 2012 by Doug Luberts

Note: This entry kind of grew to gargantuan size, as there is just so much to talk about when it comes to Twitter as a social networking tool. It is mostly intended for folks who are new to social networking, and Twitter, or who have had a tough time finding their voice, and building a presence, although there might be something there for old Twitterists as well.

Oh, teh twitterz…My old friend. I start this entry with ‘The Twitter Song’ by ihatemornings (Ben Walker), as a reminder of where we’ve come from, and where we’ve gone … And a lot of the stuff that Ben polks fun at in his music video is still completely on-point.

Twitter can be fun, entertaining, perplexing, infuriating, and all of that at the same time…It’s pretty much replaced most commercial news outlets as my primary source of news and information, as well as a tool for marketing my personal brand, my web portal and video productions, and, most importantly, a way of staying connected to all of the friends and colleagues that I’ve made in the web space.

Twitter’s tag line has always been ‘join the conversation’, but that conversation is changing…Twitter has grown up over the past few years, and the way folks are using Twitter are changing as a result of the product maturity, and experience that has come out of the communal experience of the last few years.

Joining the conversation, and getting your voice heard can be a challenge, and building a professional presence can be daunting for a lot of folks, unless you’ve got someone who’s figured all of this crap out giving you some pointers…Which is what I’m going to do.

I’ve been helping some friends lately with advice on how to use social media to help get their documentary funded. A ‘social media plan’ if you will…and my friend tells me he’s gotten some benefit from the ideas I was throwing out, so I figured I’d share…

Now, I don’t sell myself as one of those ‘Social Media Strategists’ that seem to turn up daily on my Twitter followers tab, promising to help get me thousands of followers and make lots of money using Twitter…I never follow these folks, and they usually go away real fast. Not to say that there aren’t real social media gurus out there, but the real experts tend to be folks who are working in full-service media and public relations capacities who have developed their expertise, and are using it, in the context of the broader services they provide their clients.

I’m just interested in sharing what I’ve learned, and am learning, because it’s still an evolving process, with friends, and all you folks, for free…Because I don’t think using social media approaches anything near the complexity of quantum mechanics, or anything you can’t learn yourself without having to hire someone who is going to charge you good coin for what basically amounts to common-sense ideas.

Also, the folks who have been my mentors, and who I’ve learned all the basics from, offered their basic game books for free…So look at it as giving back.

First a few things for new Tweeters:

Get an Account

First step, and the easiest…Get yourself a twitter account.

Two suggestions:

Use your full name for your name, and whatever you feel comfortable with as your handled (I used @dougluberts, but some folks like something more creative, and/or brand-oriented for their handle. Keep the handled short, because it will be helpful when folks tweet at you and re-tweet you if your handled doesn’t take up too many of the 140 characters available for a tweet.

Use a headshot for your Avatar, unless you are setting up an account for a web site or brand that uses a logo for its primary identity…Let people see a photo of you, and they will be more likely to become comfortable with you, and want to follow your feed.

Tweet Something

Well, you’re hooked up. Say something.

It’s your brand, what do you want to Tweet about? One thing that you will hear me say, again, and again, is that this is a conversation…Tweet things that you will will draw other folks into the conversation.

A lot of n00bs will make the mistake of tweeting their mundane actions:

Wrong: Just had some spinocolli for dinner.

Better: Tweet a fantastic photo of an amazing dinner you prepared that will make your followers’ mouths water.

Homework: Learn about #hastags, and how to use them.

Getting into the conversation: Following and Followers

Find some folks to follow, with whom you share a common interest, or affinity. Twitter will help you get going with a new account.

First piece of advice: Don’t worry about who is following you. Figure out what your interests, passions, and/or personal brand is, and follow people who have the same, or related interests with you.

Next, follow the conversations that these folks are having, and throw tweets at them when you have something to say…Remember, this is a conversation.

Engage with people with whom you share interests. Ask direct questions…The worst thing you can do at first is throw open-ended tweets out and expect folks who aren’t following you to respond. Ask  someone something specific, comment on a tweet from a celebrity, or subject matter guru, with a joke…Or share some information with them that would be of interest from THEIR perspective.

One thing you can do is quote other folks tweets with your own comments in front of them. That creates a new tweet in your stream, that all of your followers will see, and the other person will see in their @connect tab. This is often a great conversation starter.

You will find that even some very big celebs, with huge followings, will sometimes respond to you…Not all, especially the ones who have assistants tweeting for them (which I think is kind of bogus, and most of the celebs and weblebs (social media celebrities) who I know personally, only tweet for themselves…)

Don’t be discouraged if your first tweet or two doesn’t get you into a conversation…Keep at it.

Again, who you follow is more important than who is following you, so don’t get caught up in a numbers game. It can take a long time to build up a following unless you’ve got a built-in brand factor, like a Lady Gaga or Aston Kutcher…You won’t go from zero to a bazillion-gagillion followers in a day.

Don’t get bummed if folks you would like to have as followers (and those are usually the folks with the big social media profiles, so everyone wants to be followed by them) don’t follow you back, even if they have a good tweeting relationship with you…It’s the communication that’s important, and while some celebs will follow everyone who follows them, many folks (including myself) try to keep their following count low, so  they can keep the ‘signal-to-noise’ ratio low on their personal stream.

I’m following about 700 folks, which is too many, and it gets really tough to focus, and pick up on key messages, if you’re following too many people.

Also, some folks also use things like Tweetdeck, and Twitterific, so that they can set up filters and groups…You may be getting a lot more air time than you think (but don’t count on it.)

Again, focus on who you are following, and the content that you create…Add value to the information stream and the followers will come in time.

It is good to know your followers, at least in general terms (It gets hard to keep up with after a while), especially if they turn out to have information streams that are similar to yours, and you want to follow them. One good tool to use for checking out who is following/not following you, who un-follows you, and such, is who.unfollowed.me.

Who.unfollowed.me is actually a complete set of tools for tracking your followers. There is a free, or ‘lite’ version, which I use currently, that gives you a lot of functionality to see who your followers are, and when they leave you.

 

By using who.unfollowed.me, and checking it periodically, you can see if you’re tweets are attracting, or chasing off, the kind of followers that you consider are key to your personal brand…Or if you’ve just got a lot of churn going on in your followers because of bots…A problem Twitter has yet to effectively deal with.

Again, don’t get too hung up on who un-follows you at a micro level…Some folks might just want to connect with you in other ways, like Facebook or Google+, or sometimes you might just not meet their information processing bandwidth requirements (too many tweets, not enough tweets.) Look for trends of who is following and un-following you, and don’t get hung up on individuals.

For judging the overall effectiveness of your social media efforts across platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, WordPress, etc.), there is Klout.com (although I find their math, and overall logic to be somewhat vague), and peerindex.com, two analytics sites that are very useful, and will be the topic of future write-ups.

RTs and Getting Your Stuff Out There

A few years ago, this was pretty simple…You tweet about your stuff, I retweet you, and you reciprocate. Got a hot project? Just tweet a celeb, and ask for a re-tweet. No problem, right?

Well, that was then, and now is different. Things have gotten a lot more complicated than BITD (and by that I mean 2008. :) )

A lot of folks will not tweet or re-tweet anything other than things that either:

1) Are part of their product line or brand

2) They have a vested interest in

3) Are videos, products, or stories from trusted friends and partners

4) They get paid to do product placement in their tweets

or

5) They just don’t give a crap about anything but self-promotion and are just shouting their own virtues, non-stop, at the top of their lungs, into cyberspace

Twitter has grown up, as I mentioned before…Companies, big and small, have Twitter policies. Many companies will look at tweets by employees about company business as if the employee is acting as a press resource…You tweet about the guy who TP’d the corporate bathroom, and you’re making an unauthorized press release about company business. That can be embarrassing to the company, and might just get you fired.

Some companies, even some small production companies doing web content, have policies in place about not tweeting about other company’s videos or products unless it is part of their overall strategic marketing plan…You’ve got a buddy working for WeeWeeSmall Productions, who you think should be re-tweeting your latest vid, and get irked when he doesn’t? Well, he might not be able to do that and keep his employers happy.

It’s become increasingly difficult to cut through all of the noise of Twitter, and other social media platforms, and get a brand presence established (which is one of the reasons I’m trying to give content creators an edge, with respect to geek-affinity content, by offering content aggregation on GeektasticNebula.com in an effort to create a unified brand from many smaller ones.) That can be a factor for some folks who feel that using their social media presence to promote other brands and products is at cross-purposes with their own goals…So they don’t. It’s tough, but this is business, and although I don’t necessarily agree with that type of approach, everyone approaches their social media strategy, and rules for engagement, in their own, or their company’s, way.

Then there’s the problem of, “Hey, if I tweet for you, then I’ve gotta’ tweet for this other guy, and his two friends, and …”, and the next thing you know, you’re in the middle of all kinds of interpersonal dynamics issues over person X feeling disrespected because you didn’t retweet their stuff, but did for person Y.

It can be a friggin’ mess…

And that only escalates with the profile of the person being asked to do the tweeting…I’ve got a few friends that are pretty big players in the space, and they are constantly being bombarded with requests to tweet stuff for them…At some point they’ve just got to say no, both to keep peace, and because it gets to be too much of a time suck, and, face it, we’ve all got our own work to do…

One friend told me, a few years ago, that they were asked to get some big Hollywood producer they knew to tweet about something or other, and the response was, “Uh, no…I can’t do that.”

Because that would be one way of losing that producer’s ear, as bandwidth, and face-time, are valuable commodities for busy people.

I no sooner heard that story than someone approached me with a “You know…if you could get so-and-so to tweet about my stuff, I could really do something great…”. Yeah, you and everybody else. :)

I don’t, as a rule, ask folks to tweet, or re-tweet for me…If they want to it’s appreciated, but you’ve got to respect people’s time, and keep expectations real. If someone likes your stuff enough, and isn’t otherwise constrained by any of the other factors, you’ll get your message out.  I have great Twitter conversations with folks, all the time, who don’t re-tweet my stuff…And it’s all good, because we’re interacting, and that’s what is important.

Again, the message here is that Tweeting and Re-Tweeting can be a lot more complicated, for the reasons I’ve mentioned, than seems obvious. Don’t get frustrated by failure to get RT’d…Just keep doing your thing.

Non-RT Responses from High-Profile Tweeters

There are also a lot of instances where the absolute last thing you want is for someone with a few million followers to RT your post…Especially if you’re a blogger with a site on a non-industrial-strength host, and you’re tweeting a blog link  (Doug raises hand and points at himself.)

I use a pretty good hosting company, that offers unlimited bandwidth for a reasonable rate…One that is sustainable for the level of interest this blog receives, but is also affordable for someone who doesn’t derive the kind of ad revenue necessary (yet, but hopeful…) to sustain the cost of a dedicated server. I can take a good burst of hits in the thousands…But that’s about it.

In short, while I can take a pretty good amount of traffic in every-day use, one re-tweet from a celebrity like Stephen Fry, with his 3.8 million followers, and my host’s non-dedicated server would die a quick and painful death from the resulting traffic. Taking down all the sites on the server I’m sharing the space with, and having some poor guy in a basement somewhere going nuts trying to get everything back online.

The usual result is that the hosting company kicks you off of their service, because their ‘unlimited bandwidth’ deal isn’t really a free lunch, and you wind up scrambling for a new web host while loosing traffic, which is a huge PITA.

I’ve seen this a lot, and have one friend who I refer to, kiddingly, as Kali 2.0, as she has been known to lay waste to entire web sites with a mere touch of the re-tweet button (Yes, I’m talking about Felicia Day…How long into the post did you think it was going to be before her name came up? Seriously. :p )

Kidding aside, celebrities like Stephen Fry and Felicia Day have learned, the hard way, that a well-intentioned RT can cause unbridled havoc. Which is why you might see other things, like having your tweet favorited, or post bookmarked, or a comment liked on Facebook, a video favorited on YouTube, etc … Which will be a great show of support, show you that your efforts are being recognized, and drive traffic your way without making any data centers, or IT-tech people’s heads, explode.

It’s a good thing, and should be appreciated when it happens…

Paid Product Tweeters/Promoters

Case, #4 is the one that I, and many folks that I know, don’t really like…The paid product placement tweeter.

As discussed in this Huffington Post article, there are folks out there who make money by freelancing their Twitter feeds. Some of these are big players, like Kim Kardashian or Snoop Dogg, and some are folks who are much lower on the radar, but still have significant ability to influence a brand based on their authority with, and demographic make-up of, their followers.

An advertiser pays them, and they will start tweeting about the product/brand in question as if they were just really into whatever the product is, and you would think, based on whatever drives you to follow that Tweeter, that they are giving you info based on their own preferences…Using their social capital with you to get you to buy into what they are being paid to tweet about.

I think it kinda’ sucks. No, actually, it outright sucks…It’s a breach of trust, when you think about it.

There is nothing wrong with paid product placement…As a model it’s been around a long time, and as a financing model for web video it has proven effective (I’m thinking specifically of shows like Ileana Douglas’ ‘Easy to Assemble‘ which is set in an Ikea store, and sponsored by Ikea), and there is nothing wrong with it … As long as it’s out in the open, and you’re aware of it. Same with branded Twitter identities, such as production companies and shows, that Tweet their sponsors products…Nothing wrong with it at all.

What I’m talking about is the Tweeters/Bloggers who surreptitiously slip product placement into their twitter stream when I’m following them because I trust their taste in <FILL IN THE BLANK>. They are misusing their position as a thought leader, and, to me, this is wholesale BS.

It’s also a part of why YouTube has a paid product placement policy in place for shows that are monetizing content through AdSense.

Twitter really should have a policy about this, but I don’t see it as being enforceable…Especially for a company that still hasn’t figured out how to deal with the porn-and-spam-bot problem that is a huge, rampant, pain in the butt.

Often, it’s hard to tell when someone is doing it, unless they are just an obvious Twitter sell-sword, in which case you might recognize products that are off-brand suddenly popping up in their stream on a regular basis…Often times folks will be a lot more subtle.

The Pure, and Shameless, Self-Promoter

Finally, there are some folks out their who are just shouting their own message into cyberspace, and don’t give a crap…I don’t know why you’d want to follow someone like that, unless they are just that damn compelling that being a voyeur into their lives is appealing, but these types can benefit your own social media activities, in some cases, as I’ll explain in the next section.

“Well, that was kind of depressing as hell, Doug, what do I do to get my stuff recognized?”

Easy…Add value.

Don’t count on anyone else to promote your video, product, book, neat idea, whatever…Build your own social media profile by being part of the conversation, and adding value to it.

Maybe folks won’t tweet, or re-tweet about your message, but they almost always are willing to tweet, re-tweet, or join in a conversation about their own.

Be a fan…Be a supporter.

Find stuff that falls into your passion, or affinity, zone that others are doing, and support them. Build relationships, and join in conversations.

Write blog articles that review other web shows, or events, or products. Tweet about that, and that the creators of those other events and/or products will drive traffic to your site, because it is great for their marketing plan. That’s how you will develop a voice…as well as brand authority, which is important.

In doing so, you may not be getting direct support for your brand, but by developing your profile through tweets, retweets, and conversations about things related to your own brand, you will build a following, and that will enable to you get your message out there, on your own, without having to rely on the value of someone else’s social media identity to do it.

It works…in time. But there’s another part of this as well…

Don’t rely on Twitter as your only social media platform

Twitter has become a less-than-ideal communications medium for trying to get your message out there, for a number of reasons.

There is only so much you can communicate in 140 characters and, as I mentioned before, the signal-to-noise ratio on Twitter is pretty high, and not likely to get any lower. I’ve had recent conversations with friends who regularly follow me, that had no idea that I was producing a new show…Wow! Discouraging. Clearly an indication that noise is a factor.

Also consider that there are now ‘promoted tweets’ (and tweeters), and that Twitter is really just starting to get going with its own monetization strategy which will likely drive up the noise level for those who don’t have advertising dollars to spend.

No, you need to go to other places.

Facebook is important. Google+ is important, and becoming more important…Especially with the synergies between Google+, YouTube, and AdSense, Google is looking to maximize both the user experience, and their return on investment.

If you’re not spending a significant amount of time leveraging these other platforms, as well as Tumblr, Flickr, and LinkedIn, you are missing opportunities.

Yes, it’s a lot of work, and Google+ is not nearly as easy to integrate with the other platforms … and I don’t think Google thinks its in their best interest to be. They want to provide as much of a one-stop shopping experience as possible, and maximize revenues.

I’ll talk more about these other platforms, as well as analytics and social media profile tools, in a future entry.

Would love comments, and questions, and any feedback on if you folks feel that blog entries like this are helpful …

Remember, it’s a conversation, so speak up!

 

skippy

Welcome to Skippy’s Basement, our new show!

Posted on February 6, 2012 by Doug Luberts

Skippy is an ardent fanboy, comic book scholar, and contemporary sage.

He lives in the basement of his parents home in Brooklyn, New York.

He is 43 years old.

Skippy, along with his co-host, and best friend, Ralphie ‘The Wrench’ Robaccio, will be hosting a show live, on tape, from his basement, bringing Geektastic Nebula Viewers all the latest from the world of Fandom and Entertainment.

‘Skippy’s Basement’ will start airing later this month, on the Geektastic Nebula YouTube Channel.

Kiala drew this logo for the Book Club...Sorry, too WWF, not enough Labia Majora (photo by Kiala Kazebee)

Felicia’s Vaginal Fantasy Bookclub: A Google+ Video Hangout

Posted on February 5, 2012 by Doug Luberts

Update: Since I first wrote this, there has been an another edition of the Vaginal Fantasy book club for February 2012, and the ladies have agreed that the book club hangout will happen on the last Monday of every month.

You can view the February Hangout here…Wherein they discuss “Silent in the Grave” by Deanna Raybourn (Well, I think they did…In between all the drinking, and talk of which hunky celebrities and fantasy characters they’d most like to have their way with… )

You read the title right…and no, I haven’t sold out and gone into the smut-peddling business (yet), nor have I turned to writing a sordid exposé about Felicia Day to earn coin.

No, my friends, this is a bit of a review of Felicia’s latest new media experiment, and, once again, she’s on to something great here …

The concept: use the fairly-new technology of Google+ video hangouts as a forum to assemble a group of notable women writers and new-media personalities for a monthly book club discussing ‘Vaginal Fantasy’ genre lit…For those not familiar, I think this also falls under the heading of ‘Bodice Ripper’ romance novels, the kind of stuff involving cover photos of shirtless, long haired, overly-adrenal males having their way with stacked beauties (I may have passed one in a book store, or grocery checkout, once.)

Multi-cam format allows a switch-feed to the main screen, while viewers get thumbnails of all participants below.

Felicia’s been a devourer of the genre as far back as I can remember, once tweeting about going on a ‘Highland Hunk’ buying spree (Bodice rippers involving dudes with six packs in kilts [usually 'worn true', I'd imagine, although trying hard not to...]) at the 3rd Street Promenade after quaffing an adult beverage with dinner (Felicia doesn’t drink much, and I’m told by sources, who shall go nameless, except his initials are ‘Sandeep Parikh‘, hilarity often ensues on such occasions…Sandeep is what you call an ‘enabler’.)

So the book club is another project where the subject matter is an affinity for Felicia, who mentioned, a couple of weeks back, that she decided to do the book club last-minute, as a fun project with some friends.

Well, this ‘fun project’ is not only that, but it’s an exciting format, with a lot of potential for growth, and an excellent use of an enabling technology, the G+ video hangout. The hangouts put the kind of live, multi-camera, switch feed capabilities into the hands of content creators that big-media broadcasters have had for years, and that new media creators, like Leo Laporte, have spent small fortunes to implement on their own.

Yeah, there have been options for this from U-stream, and Blip-TV, for a while, but this seems easier, and with the overall integration between Google+ and YouTube, this is going to be a killer app … But before I geek out too much on the convergence-media aspects of the tech, let’s talk about the show, because that is why we watch.

Joining Felicia are Veronica Belmont, from Tekzilla and TWiT TV, and the Sword and Laser podcast, Bonnie Burton, Sr. Editor for StarWars.com (and a colleague of mine in a galaxy far, far away), and Kiala Kazeebee, blogger, writer for The Nerdist and Nerdpuddle, and prolific Twitterer about pie and alcohol (usually both, and at the same time.)

It’s these ladies that make the show something other than a garden-variety video podcast, and turn it into a truly compelling, and fun to watch show, in that their personalities are diverse, complementary, and taken together have an amazing interactive chemistry.

'VaginalFantasy' was a trending topic, World-wide, on Twitter during the premiere broadcast. (photo by Kiala Kazebee)

Slight disclaimer…I’ve known this crew for years, except for Veronica, whom I’ve not met, and not a small part of the reason I tuned in was to see my friends doing their thing, as well as see what Bonnie and Kiala would bring in a video format, as they’ve both been known primarilly as writers to date (although Bonnie has a collection of old ‘Ask Bonnie‘ videos from her days at the now defunct webwaste.com, that are pretty damn funny, and worth the watch.)

Everyone brings something slighting different to the round-table…Felicia and Veronica are pretty much known quantities in terms of their presentation style, but having the freedom to cut loose, and the license for off-color humor offered by the subject matter (I mean…When your show name starts with ‘Vaginal Fantasy’ what ISN’T on the table?), both present new sides of themselves.

Kiala is a natural as far as the broadcasting side of things goes…She was coordinating all of the questions and monitoring comments from G+ and Twitter, while keeping the momentum going with the conversation and color commentary … She’s a lot like a Robin Quivers-type (Robin Quimvers?) to Felicia’s host role (No, I’m not going to compare Felicia Day to Howard Stern, first off she’s nothing like Stern, and secondly, she’d likely kick my butt… ;) )

Bonnie brings a really great oddball dynamic to the group…She’s kind of like that crazy Aunt many of us have … You know, the one that’s a lot younger than your Mom, so she’s one of us, but is kind of whacky, yet world-wise, and is usually the family member that gets a little drunk (okay, a lot drunk) at family gatherings and tells the inappropriate jokes that make Mom turn photographically-unreproducible colors, while laying the rest of the crowd out laughing.

Plus, she was badly lit, un-prepared because she hadn’t read the book, and started going off-topic and doing bits with a taxidermied chipmunk (Bonnie is big into Anthropomorphic Taxidermy, IRL…) that was totally off the hook.

It was frikkin’ brilliant, and I hope they will add Bonnie’s being somewhat out-of-step as a running gag with the show, which would just add more comedy value.

Now, as I guy, you’d probably expect me to write something like, “Yeah, I watched it to see my friends, and to see how they used the new tech, but although the ‘Vaginal Fantasy Hangout’ is sure to be a hit with, and a great show for, women,  it’s not something that a guy would watch.”

Yeah, I could write that, but it would pretty much be a load…

Hey! Dudes! I’m talking you with the Penises…This is a show with a bunch of hot chicks talking dirty about smutty topics…You are going to LOVE this show. Tell the wife you’re watching it to get in touch with women’s sensibilities, so you can understand her better, and watch for the quim jokes.

In the words of Alexander Lavelle “Xander” Harris, “Yes, men like sports. Men watch the action movie. They eat of the beef and enjoy to look at the bosoms”…Men will also like watching women talking funny about sexy books. Dudes will love this show.

Kiala drew this logo for the Book Club...Sorry, too WWF, not enough Labia Majora (photo by Kiala Kazebee)

It IS also a great show for women…There is something outstanding about the idea of a book-club show that focuses on a feminine-interest genre that is the opposite of high-brow, offers lots of opportunities for jokes and diversions, and has a wonderfully compelling cast of smart ladies who are both knowledgeable and passionate about the subject matter.

The common thread that seems to run through whatever Felicia Day does, and I’ve often heard her say this in interviews, is to follow your passions…Once again, she’s done that with the book club, and that has lead her to something awesome and will, I believe, be another out-of-the-park hit with the fans.

As of yesterday, scheduling for The Vaginal Fantasy Book Club (and they’ve got their own tumblr blog set up already, and I’m almost mortified, yet intrigued, about what the visual design may look like if Kiala has anything to say about it based on her logo sketch …) was still a bit up-in-the-air, so follow Felicia, Veronica, Bonnie, and Kiala, on Twitter, to keep up with the latest.

Felicia will also be launching her new YouTube Premium Channel, Geek & Sundry, in March, so check them out on the Web and YouTube and expect more great content from the creator of ‘The Guild.’

  • Twitter Feed

    • Poor Molly. #SherlockPBS 1 hour ago
    • I'm watching Sherlock (5918 others checked-in) http://t.co/VXUHUNGj @GetGlue #SherlockPBS 2 hours ago
    • Art: The Pixar Avengers Looks Like the Best Pixar Movie Ever - @Gizmodo http://t.co/0jZQSbY4 3 hours ago
    • RT @hoverbird: As Twitter is to earthquakes, Instagram is to eclipses. 3 hours ago
    • RT @theashetray: John Knoll peed his pants today. 3 hours ago
    • RT @textinstagram: The sun 3 hours ago
  • The Geektastic Nebula

    • Geektastic Nebula on Google+
    • Geektastic Nebula on YouTube
    • Geektastic Nebula Twitter (@geektastictv)
    • Geektastic Nebula Web Site
  • TurboMandala Entertainment

    • Doug's YouTube Channel
    • Official Site
    • TurboMandala Twitter (@turbomandala)
    • TurboMandala YouTube Channel
  • Xtra News and Resources

    • Celebrate the Web
    • IAWTV
    • TubeFilter
  • Archives

    • May 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • December 2006
    • October 2006
    • November 2005
    • September 2005
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
  • Connect with me:
  • © 2012 Doug Luberts
  • All Rights Reserved.